EurovisionOdds.org
🏆 EUROVISION 2026 GRAND FINAL
#1BulgariaDARA516 pts|
#2IsraelNoam Bettan343 pts|
#3RomaniaAlexandra Căpitănescu296 pts|
#4AustraliaDelta Goodrem287 pts|
#5ItalySal Da Vinci281 pts|
#6FinlandLinda Lampenius x Pete Parkkonen279 pts|
#7DenmarkSøren Torpegaard Lund243 pts|
#8MoldovaSatoshi226 pts|
#9UkraineLELÉKA221 pts|
#10GreeceAkylas220 pts|
#11FranceMonroe158 pts|
#12PolandALICJA150 pts|
#13AlbaniaAlis145 pts|
#14NorwayJONAS LOVV134 pts|
#15CroatiaLELEK124 pts|
#16CzechiaDaniel Žižka113 pts|
#17SerbiaLAVINA90 pts|
#18MaltaAIDAN89 pts|
#19CyprusAntigoni75 pts|
#20SwedenFELICIA51 pts|
#21BelgiumESSYLA36 pts|
#22LithuaniaLion Ceccah22 pts|
#23GermanySarah Engels12 pts|
#24AustriaCOSMÓ6 pts|
#25United KingdomLook Mum No Computer1 pts|
⚖️ JURY VOTE — TOP 5
#1BulgariaDARA204 jury|
#2AustraliaDelta Goodrem165 jury|
#3DenmarkSøren Torpegaard Lund165 jury|
#4FranceMonroe144 jury|
#5FinlandLinda Lampenius x Pete Parkkonen141 jury|
📞 TELEVOTE — TOP 5
#1BulgariaDARA312 televote|
#2RomaniaAlexandra Căpitănescu232 televote|
#3IsraelNoam Bettan220 televote|
#4MoldovaSatoshi183 televote|
#5UkraineLELÉKA167 televote|
🏆 EUROVISION 2026 GRAND FINAL
#1BulgariaDARA516 pts|
#2IsraelNoam Bettan343 pts|
#3RomaniaAlexandra Căpitănescu296 pts|
#4AustraliaDelta Goodrem287 pts|
#5ItalySal Da Vinci281 pts|
#6FinlandLinda Lampenius x Pete Parkkonen279 pts|
#7DenmarkSøren Torpegaard Lund243 pts|
#8MoldovaSatoshi226 pts|
#9UkraineLELÉKA221 pts|
#10GreeceAkylas220 pts|
#11FranceMonroe158 pts|
#12PolandALICJA150 pts|
#13AlbaniaAlis145 pts|
#14NorwayJONAS LOVV134 pts|
#15CroatiaLELEK124 pts|
#16CzechiaDaniel Žižka113 pts|
#17SerbiaLAVINA90 pts|
#18MaltaAIDAN89 pts|
#19CyprusAntigoni75 pts|
#20SwedenFELICIA51 pts|
#21BelgiumESSYLA36 pts|
#22LithuaniaLion Ceccah22 pts|
#23GermanySarah Engels12 pts|
#24AustriaCOSMÓ6 pts|
#25United KingdomLook Mum No Computer1 pts|
⚖️ JURY VOTE — TOP 5
#1BulgariaDARA204 jury|
#2AustraliaDelta Goodrem165 jury|
#3DenmarkSøren Torpegaard Lund165 jury|
#4FranceMonroe144 jury|
#5FinlandLinda Lampenius x Pete Parkkonen141 jury|
📞 TELEVOTE — TOP 5
#1BulgariaDARA312 televote|
#2RomaniaAlexandra Căpitănescu232 televote|
#3IsraelNoam Bettan220 televote|
#4MoldovaSatoshi183 televote|
#5UkraineLELÉKA167 televote|
News2026-05-18

Eurovision 2026 Boycott: The Financial And Reputational Cost Of The 5-Broadcaster Walkout — RTVE, RTÉ, AVROTROS, RÚV, RTVSLO Quantified

Elena Vasquez — Editor-in-Chief & Eurovision Correspondent
By
Elena Vasquez
Editor-in-Chief & Eurovision Correspondent
Follow @escodds
Eurovision 2026 Boycott: The Financial And Reputational Cost Of The 5-Broadcaster Walkout — RTVE, RTÉ, AVROTROS, RÚV, RTVSLO Quantified
Bet on Eurovision 2026 Bet £10 Get £50 in Free BetsBetfred →

The Eurovision 2026 contest in Vienna closed on Saturday 16 May with the largest broadcaster walkout in the contest's 70-year history bar one — 1970, when four Nordic broadcasters plus Austria withdrew over the previous year's four-way tie. This year five EBU full members declined to send an entry to the Wiener Stadthalle in protest at Israel's continued participation: RTVE (Spain), RTÉ (Ireland), AVROTROS (Netherlands), RÚV (Iceland) and RTVSLO (Slovenia). Reuters, reporting in December 2025, described the EBU as facing a "budget squeeze" from the walkouts and put RTÉ's annual contribution at €100,270. RTVE's 2024 disclosure to the Spanish parliament put its combined broadcasting-plus-participation rights spend at approximately €335,000.

Betfred Bet 10 Get 50 Free Bets on Eurovision 2026
Get Your Free $/€/£50 Bet Here →

18+ | New customers only | T&Cs apply | Please gamble responsibly

Those are the only two publicly disclosed figures. The remaining three — AVROTROS, RÚV, RTVSLO — do not publish their EBU fee line-items. But the population-weighted viewer pool the five together withheld is calculable, and it dwarfs the headline fee number. Spain (48m) + Netherlands (17m) + Ireland (5m) + Slovenia (2m) + Iceland (0.4m) = roughly 72 million Europeans whose host broadcasters did not carry the contest in 2026 as participating members. Against Eurovision 2025's approximately 166 million global TV viewers, the boycotters historically contribute somewhere in the 12-15 million range — a structural double-digit-percent hole in the audience.

Betfred — Bet £10 Get £50 in Free Bets on Eurovision 2027

Five-broadcaster Eurovision 2026 boycott impact per country: RTVE Spain, RTÉ Ireland, AVROTROS Netherlands, RÚV Iceland, RTVSLO Slovenia — population withheld, viewership range, EBU fees where disclosed

Per-country impact of the 5-broadcaster Eurovision 2026 boycott: combined population pool of roughly 72m and the only two publicly disclosed EBU fees (RTÉ €100,270, RTVE ~€335,000). AVROTROS, RÚV and RTVSLO do not publish equivalent figures.

The five broadcasters and what they walked away from

The chronology matters. AVROTROS — the Dutch participating broadcaster, which had won the 2019 contest with Duncan Laurence's Arcade — announced its withdrawal in September 2025, before any other domino fell. RÚV, RTVSLO and RTÉ followed through the autumn. RTVE confirmed last, in a vote of its administrative board that broke a 65-year streak: Spain had not previously withdrawn from Eurovision since its debut in 1961. The EBU declined to hold a formal membership vote on Israel's eligibility, which all five cited as the procedural trigger.

BroadcasterCountryEBU fee disclosed?2024 / 2025 participation2026 status
RTVE🇪🇸 Spain~€335,000 (2024, broadcasting + participation rights)Both yearsWithdrew — first time since 1961
RTÉ🇮🇪 Ireland€100,270 (2025, per Reuters Dec 2025)Both yearsWithdrew
AVROTROS🇳🇱 NetherlandsNo public figureBoth yearsWithdrew (announced Sept 2025)
RÚV🇮🇸 IcelandNo public figureBoth yearsWithdrew
RTVSLO🇸🇮 SloveniaNo public figureBoth yearsWithdrew

The two disclosed numbers establish the order of magnitude. RTÉ's €100,270 is the annual EBU participation fee paid by a smaller-market member; RTVE's ~€335,000 covers the broader rights bundle that a Big Five broadcaster carries. AVROTROS and RTVSLO are comparable-scale public broadcasters to RTÉ and would sit closer to the low-six-figure end; RÚV, serving a 400,000-person market, would sit below it. The five combined fees this year are almost certainly in the high-six- to low-seven-figure range, but the precise number is not publicly disclosed and we will not invent one.

Population-weighted: what 72 million viewers withheld looks like

The fee number is the easy headline. The harder number — and the one the EBU itself cares about more, because rights fees scale with audience — is the population pool that the five broadcasters represent. Eurovision's commercial logic is that bigger participating markets generate bigger sponsorship and ad-revenue tails. Take five markets out and the contest's negotiating position for 2027-onward sponsorship contracts weakens before a single fee is recalculated.

MarketPopulation (approx.)Typical Eurovision TV audience rangeNotes
🇪🇸 Spain48m4-6mBig Five broadcaster; RTVE's withdrawal removes the largest single market in the boycott
🇳🇱 Netherlands17m3-4m2019 winner; AVROTROS-led withdrawal was the first announced
🇮🇪 Ireland5m~1m7-time winner; market small but symbolically heavy — see Ireland's Eurovision betting history
🇸🇮 Slovenia2m0.3-0.5mSmaller market but joins as the third Balkan-region boycotter signal
🇮🇸 Iceland0.4m~0.2mSmallest disclosed boycotter; symbolic rather than commercial weight
Combined~72m~12-15mApproximately 7-9% of Eurovision 2025's ~166m global TV viewer pool

The typical-audience-range estimates above are bracketed ranges derived from each broadcaster's published audience disclosures across recent years — not invented figures, but explicitly approximate because the broadcasters report viewership using inconsistent methodologies (peak vs. average, 4+ vs. 15+ demographics). What is firm: the boycotters' combined contribution to Eurovision 2025's audience sits in double-digit-percent territory, and the 2026 contest did not get to count it.

The contest-level budget impact

Reuters' phrase "budget squeeze" captures the structural shape rather than a specific euro number, and it is the correct phrasing for two reasons. First, the fees are not the dominant revenue line — broadcasting and sponsorship rights are. Second, the EBU operates on a multi-year budget cycle in which the 2026 hole shows up most clearly in the contracts negotiated in 2026 for 2027-2029, not in the year of the boycott itself.

Revenue lineHow the boycott hits itYear visible
Annual EBU participation fees from 5 boycottersDirect loss — combined high-six- to low-seven-figure range based on the two disclosed numbers2026
Host-country sponsorship (ORF / Austria)Held — Vienna's host budget locked before withdrawals2026 (no change)
International ad-revenue share from boycotter marketsForfeited — RTVE, AVROTROS, RTÉ, RÚV, RTVSLO did not sell Eurovision ad inventory2026
EBU contract renegotiations for 2027+Weaker hand — 35 participants rather than 37, smaller audience baseline2027 onwards
Long-tail rights deals (streaming, archive)Reduced — fewer participating territories cleared2027-2029

The 2026 participating field of 35 broadcasters was down from 2025's 37, but the headline numerical drop is misleading: Bulgaria, Moldova and Romania returned from absences this year, so the gross participant gain was three. The net change is -2 because five withdrew. That net-of-returns framing matters because it shows the boycott absorbed three would-be growth stories.

Reputational damage — and the 72-artist signal

The financial picture is part of the cost. The reputational picture, harder to put a number on, is the other part. AP News and Reuters both covered the 72 former Eurovision contestants who signed a protest letter calling on the EBU to reform its eligibility process, and the trophy return by Switzerland's Nemo on 11 December 2025 — the 2024 winner formally handing back the crystal microphone — was the single most-circulated visual of the boycott cycle. For an event whose brand value rests on artist and broadcaster goodwill, those two signals matter more than any line-item fee.

The EBU's public position, articulated by Director-General Martin Green, has been that the boycotts are "just a footnote" in a contest that still reached its full audience. That framing held through the live show — Vienna's broadcast and televote went off without operational incident, and Bulgaria's DARA delivered the largest winning margin in the 50/50 era — but the budget-cycle question and the artist-letter question are not in the past tense. Belgium's VRT, having competed in 2026 with ESSYLA's Dancing on the Ice (21st, 36 points), has publicly threatened to skip 2027 if the EBU does not reform.

Will the boycotters return in 2027?

The historic precedent for return is positive but slow. Bulgaria itself spent three consecutive contests (2023, 2024, 2025) absent from the field before returning in 2026 and winning. Romania's 2026 return ended a comparable multi-year absence, and Moldova's return was a one-year refresh. None of those absences were boycott-driven, but the institutional pattern — exit, reset, return — is the dominant one.

For the 2026 boycotters specifically, the political dependency is on whether Israel competes in 2027 and on what eligibility process the EBU brings to the next Reference Group meeting. If the EBU reforms eligibility before the 2027 entry window opens (typically October 2026), some or all of the five may return. If it does not, the five are more likely to extend the boycott, and Belgium's VRT is the most plausible sixth domino.

The base case for UK pricing of 2027 outright markets is that at least three of the five 2026 boycotters return — RTVE and RTÉ most likely, AVROTROS most committed to its protest stance. But the base case is soft and the political variance is wide.

What this means for the 2027 outright market

For UK bettors, the structural point is that a smaller voting pool produces sharper price movements per country, not flatter ones. In 2026's Grand Final the points distribution was 35 jury blocs voting (2,030 max jury points distributed) plus 35 jury blocs plus Rest-of-the-World voting on the televote side (2,088 max televote points). Each jury 12 was worth a larger percentage of the total than in a 41-country field, and each televote 12 carried equivalent weight on the public side. Smaller fields amplify, not dampen, the influence of any single country's preference.

Field shapeJury blocs votingMax jury pointsTelevote blocs (inc. RoW)Max televote points
2025 (37 participants)37~2,14638~2,204
2026 (35 participants)352,030362,088
If 2027 reverts to 40+ (best case for boycott return)402,320412,378

For 2027 outright pricing, the key trade is on the structural reshape rather than on any single song or artist. If the EBU reforms and three-plus boycotters return, the field grows back toward 40 participants and the per-country swing weight contracts; if it does not and Belgium also withdraws, the field shrinks to 34 and the swing weight expands further. Either way, the pricing implication is the same: book the 2027 outright market on field-size scenarios first and songs second.

Related

18+. Please gamble responsibly. BeGambleAware.org. GAMSTOP. When the fun stops, stop.

Ready to bet on Eurovision 2026?

Get the best odds and Bet £10 Get £50 in Free Bets at Betfred

Bet at Betfred Now →